WCS Canada

Northern Appalachian Ecoregion Conservation Planning Atlas WMS Service

capitals capitals capitals
Service health Now:
Interface
Web Service, OGC Web Map Service 1.3.0
Keywords
Fees
unknown
Access constraints
unknown
Supported languages
No INSPIRE Extended Capabilities (including service language support) given. See INSPIRE Technical Guidance - View Services for more information.
Data provider

WCS Canada (unverified)

Contact information:

Gillian Woolmer

WCS Canada

postal:
720 Spadina Avenue, Suite 600, M5S 2T9 Toronto,, Canada

Email: 

Service metadata
No INSPIRE Extended Capabilities (including service metadata) given. See INSPIRE Technical Guidance - View Services for more information.

Ads by Google

The Northern Appalachian Ecoregion Conservation Planning atlas contains data contributed by several groups: WildLife Conservation Society of Canada (WCSCanada), Two Countries One Forest (2c1Forest), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), Nature Conservancy Canada, and The Wildlands Project (TWP).

Available map layers (106)

Northern Appalachian Ecoregion Conservation Planning Atlas WMS Service (atlas-wms)

The Northern Appalachian Ecoregion Conservation Planning atlas contains data contributed by several groups: WildLife Conservation Society of Canada (WCSCanada), Two Countries One Forest (2c1Forest), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), Nature Conservancy Canada, and The Wildlands Project (TWP).

Base layers (Base)

Base

State and Provincial Capitals (capitals)

Compiled from the National Atlas of the United states (www.nationalatlas.gov) and the Atlas of Canada (atlas.nrcan.gc.ca)

Waterbodies (Census Tiger) (waterbodies-tiger)

Compiled from the U.S. Census 2000 Tiger/Line Files (1:100,000) and the Canadian Cartographic Boundary Files 2001 Census, Statistics Canada (1:50,000).

Waterbodies (Statistics Canada) (waterbodies-statscan)

Extracted from the NIMA Vector Map Level 0 Edition 5 (2000) database with a resolution of 1:1,000,000.

Waterbodies (waterbodies)

Extracted from the NIMA Vector Map Level 0 Edition 5 (2000) database with a resolution of 1:1,000,000.

Utility Corridors (utility)

Extracted from the NIMA Vector Map Level 0 Edition 5 (2000) database with a resolution of 1:1,000,000.

Urban Areas (urban_areas)

Compiled from the U.S. Census 2000 Tiger/Line Files – Urbanized Areas (1:100,000) and the Canadian Cartographic Boundary Files 2001 Census, Statistics Canada – Urban Areas (1:50,000).

Vehicular Trails incld. 4WD (trails)

Derived from a data set created from compiling roads from the U.S. Census 2000 Tiger/Line Files (1:100,000) and a Canadian source.

State and Provincial Boundaries (polygon) (state-provinces-poly)

Compiled from the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) political boundaries data layers, National Rail Network (1:100,000) and the Canadian Cartographic Boundary Files 2001 Census.

State and Provincial Boundaries (state-provinces-line)

Compiled from the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) political boundaries data layers, National Rail Network (1:100,000) and the Canadian Cartographic Boundary Files 2001 Census.

SRTM Elevation (srtm_elevation)

Digital Elevation model compiled from datasets from the Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM). Data obtained from http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/. A raster data layer with a cell size of 60 m.

Secured Areas (U.S. Only) (secured-areas)

Secured Areas are managed parcels protected for natural resource conservation. These lands are owned and managed by various organizations: public and private, for-profit and non-profit. Compiled from numerous states, provincial and non-profit sources (refer to full metadata available into the Data Warehouse). Can only be distributed for the U.S. due to licensing constraints associated with Canadian data sources. Attributes include common name, ownership, management agency and GAP class. A vector data layer. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

SRTM Hillshade (srtm_hillshade)

A hillshade model generated from the SRTM DEM using an illumination angle of 45 degrees at and azimuth of 315 degrees. A raster data layer with a cell size of 60 m.

Rivers (rivers)

Extracted from the NIMA Vector Map Level 0 Edition 5 (2000) database with a resolution of 1:1,000,000.

Rail (rail)

Compiled from the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), National Rail Network (1:100,000) and a Canadian source.

Other Populated Places (other_places)

Compiled from the National Atlas of the United states (www.nationalatlas.gov) and the Atlas of Canada (atlas.nrcan.gc.ca)

Mines (mines)

Compiled from the USGS Mineral and Metal Operations database, 1998 (scale unknown), and the Principal Mineral Areas of Canada - Map 900A, Natural Resources Canada. 2003, 1:6,000,000, was digitized and provided by WWF Canada (contact Alexis Morgan).

Major Towns (major_towns)

Compiled from the National Atlas of the United states (www.nationalatlas.gov) and the Atlas of Canada (atlas.nrcan.gc.ca)

Local Roads (local_roads)

Derived from a data set created from compiling roads from the U.S. Census 2000 Tiger/Line Files (1:100,000) and a Canadian source.

International Boundary (international-line)

Compiled from the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) political boundaries data layers, National Rail Network (1:100,000) and the Canadian Cartographic Boundary Files 2001 Census.

Primary and Secondary Highways (highways)

Derived from a data set created from compiling roads from the U.S. Census 2000 Tiger/Line Files (1:100,000) and a Canadian source.

GTOPO DEM (gtopo_dem)

Extracted from the North America Digital Elevation Model that represents an elevation map for North America derived from the global digital elevation model (DEM) - GTOPO30 data sets from the U.S. Geological Survey's EROS Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center (EDC DAAC). The VALUE attribute represents the elevation in meters. Distributed by ESRI, Redlands, CA. A raster datasets with a cell size of 1 km.

Interstates and Expressways (expressways)

Derived from a data set created from compiling roads from the U.S. Census 2000 Tiger/Line Files (1:100,000) and a Canadian source.

Ecoregion Boundary (ecoboundary-land)

A 20km buffer around the Northern Appalachian/ Acadian Ecoregion resulting form the Ecoregional Assessment conducted by The Nature Conservancy and the Nature Conservancy of Canada (http://conserveonline.org/workspaces/ecs/napaj/nap )

Drainage Areas (drainage)

Compiled from the USGS, 1:250,000 scale Hydrologic Units of the United States (HUC8), 1994, and the Atlas of Canada National Frameworks Drainage Areas (2003), National Resources Canada 1:1,000,000

Large Dams (dams)

Created from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers National inventory of dams (NID), 2005 (scale unknown) and the Canadian Dam Association database of large dams (2003) with locations digitized using 1:50,000 topographic maps.

2C1Forest layers (Two_Countries_One_Forest)

Two_Countries_One_Forest

Conservation Priorities - Biophysical Units (Biophysical_units)

The Conservation priority ranks for biophysical units (U.S. Forest Service subsections and Canadian ecodistricts) were determined using a conservation importance vs. threat matrix. Conservation importance was based on the TNC Ecoregional Assessment and the Wildlands Network Design, while current threat was based on the Human Footprint and future threat was based on the three scenarios of Future Human Footprint. This study we lead by the 2C1Forest Science Working Group. A full report is available at http://www.2c1forest.org/en/resources/resources_docs/Special_Report_1.pdf

Conservation Priorities - Biophysical Units that Transition (biophysical_units_transition)

Biophysical units that transition from a current state of High irreplaceability / Low vulnerability to a state of High irreplaceability / High vulnerability in the future based on the Future Human Footprint are highlighted in varying colors reflecting the future scenario under which the level of threat transitions from low to high. CT = FHF Current Trends Scenario, NCL = FHF Rapid Growth - North Central Lakes Scenario, PNW = FHF Rapid Growth - Pacific Northwest Scenario

Conservation Priorities - Hydrological Units (hydrological_units)

The Conservation priority ranks for 1:250,000 Hydrological units were determined using a conservation importance vs. threat matrix. Conservation importance was based on the TNC Ecoregional Assessment and the Wildlands Network Design, while current threat was based on the Human Footprint and future threat was based on the three scenarios of Future Human Footprint. This study we lead by the 2C1Forest Science Working Group. A full report is available at http://www.2c1forest.org/en/resources/resources_docs/Special_Report_1.pdf

Conservation Priorities - Hydrological Units that Transition (hydrological_units_transition)

Hydrological units (1:250,000) that transition from a current state of High irreplaceability / Low vulnerability to a state of High irreplaceability / High vulnerability in the future based on the Future Human Footprint are highlighted in varying colors reflecting the future scenario under which the level of threat transitions from low to high. CT = FHF Current Trends Scenario, NCL = FHF Rapid Growth - North Central Lakes Scenario, PNW = FHF Rapid Growth - Pacific Northwest Scenario

Conservation Priorities - 10km sq Hexagon Planning Units (ten_km2_hexagon_planning_units)

The Conservation priority ranks for the 10km sq planning units were determined using a conservation importance vs. threat matrix. Conservation importance was based on the TNC Ecoregional Assessment and the Wildlands Network Design, while current threat was based on the Human Footprint and future threat was based on the three scenarios of Future Human Footprint. This study we lead by the 2C1Forest Science Working Group. A full report is available at http://www.2c1forest.org/en/resources/resources_docs/Special_Report_1.pdf

Conservation Priorities by Protection Status (ten_km2_hexagon_planning_units_protection_status)

This map shows the protection status of the 10km sq planning units ranked as highly irreplaceable. The Conservation priority ranks for the 10km sq planning units were determined using a conservation irreplaceability vs. threat matrix. Conservation irreplaceability was based on the TNC Ecoregional Assessment and the Wildlands Network Design, while current threat was based on the Human Footprint and future threat was based on the three scenarios of Future Human Footprint. This study we lead by the 2C1Forest Science Working Group. A full report is available at http://www.2c1forest.org/en/resources/resources_docs/Special_Report_1.pdf

Conservation Priorities - 10km sq Hexagon Planning Units that Transition (ten_km2_hexagon_planning_units_transition)

Hexagons that transition from a current state of High irreplaceability / Low vulnerability to a state of High irreplaceability / High vulnerability in the future based on the Future Human Footprint are highlighted in varying colors reflecting the future scenario under which the level of threat transitions from low to high. CT = FHF Current Trends Scenario, NCL = FHF Rapid Growth - North Central Lakes Scenario, PNW = FHF Rapid Growth - Pacific Northwest Scenario

Difference between Scenario 1 and Current Future Footprint (diff_scenario1)

The difference between Scenario 1: Current Trends and the Current Human Footprint. Created by subtracting the Future Human Footprint from the Human Footprint. A raster data layer with a grid cell size of 90m. Contributed by Two Countries, One Forest. Lead researcher Dr. Robert Baldwin.

Difference between Scenario 3 and Current Future Footprint (diff_scenario3)

The difference between Scenario 3: Rapid Influx B - North Central Lakes and the Current Human Footprint. Created by subtracting the Future Human Footprint from the Human Footprint. A raster data layer with a grid cell size of 90m. Contributed by Two Countries, One Forest. Lead researcher Dr. Robert Baldwin.

Difference between Scenario 2 and Current Future Footprint (diff_scenario2)

The difference between Scenario 2: Rapid Influx A - Pacific Northwest and the Current Human Footprint. Created by subtracting the Future Human Footprint from the Human Footprint. A raster data layer with a grid cell size of 90m. Contributed by Two Countries, One Forest. Lead researcher Dr. Robert Baldwin.

Scenario 1 - Current Trends (scenario1)

A future scenario (2040) of the Human Footprint based on current trends of growth experienced in the region in the 1990's. Based on the current Human Footprint this scenario of the future Human Footprint includes modeled layers of new residential roads, human population density, and amenity development based on the growth scenario. A raster data layer with a grid cell size of 90m. Contributed by Two Countries, One Forest. Lead researcher Dr. Robert Baldwin.

Scenario 2 - Rapid change A (scenario2)

A future scenario (2040) of the Human Footprint based on growth rates experienced in the Pacific Northwest region of the U.S. as the result of an industry boom that generated rapid urban growth. Based on the current Human Footprint this scenario of the future Human Footprint includes modeled layers of new residential roads, human population density, and amenity development based on the growth scenario. A raster data layer with a grid cell size of 90m. Contributed by Two Countries, One Forest. Lead researcher Dr. Robert Baldwin.

Scenario 3 - Rapid change B (scenario3)

A future scenario (2040) of the Human Footprint based on growth rates experienced in the North Central Lakes region of the U.S. as a result of high amenity and urban growth. Based on the current Human Footprint this scenario of the future Human Footprint includes modeled layers of new residential roads, human population density, and amenity development based on the growth scenario. A raster data layer with a grid cell size of 90m. Contributed by Two Countries, One Forest. Lead researcher Dr. Robert Baldwin.

TNC layers (The_Nature_Conservancy)

The_Nature_Conservancy

Ecological Land Units: Elevation Zone (eco_elevation)

Elevation zones used to create the Ecological Land Units. Ecological Land Units are created from a combination of 6 elevation zones, 7 geological classes and 14 landforms types. 480 unique combinations. A raster data layer with a cell size of 90 m. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

Ecological Land Units: Geology (eco_geology)

Geological classes used to create the Ecological Land Units. Ecological Land Units are created from a combination of 6 elevation zones, 7 geological classes and 14 landforms types. 480 unique combinations. A raster data layer with a cell size of 90 m. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

Ecological Land Units: Landform (eco_landform)

Landforms used to create the Ecological Land Units. Ecological Land Units are created from a combination of 6 elevation zones, 7 geological classes and 14 landforms types. 480 unique combinations. A raster data layer with a cell size of 90 m. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

Ecological Land Units: Landforms with geology shown on dry flat and gently sloping landforms (eco_landform_geology)

Ecological Land Units. A combination of 6 elevation zones, 7 geological classes and 14 landforms types. 480 unique combinations. A raster data layer with a cell size of 90 m. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

Ecological Drainage Units (edu)

EDUs are delineated as groups of 8-digit US Geological Survey Hydrologic Unit watersheds. EDUS were qualitatively defined by the TNC Freshwater Initiative using primarily USFS Fish Zoogeographic Subregions, USFS Ecoregions and Subsections, and major drainage divisions. A vector data layer. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

Northern Appalachian Terrestrial Ecoregion Subregions (subregions)

12 Ecological subregions of the Northern Appalachian Acadian Ecoregion. A vector data layer. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

Terrestrial Ecoregions (terrestrial_ecoregions)

Ecoregion boundaries for the eastern United States, with extension into Canada for NAP (Northern Appalachian/Acadian) and STL (St. Lawrence/Champlain) ecoregions. TNC Eastern Conservation Science based the boundaries on USFS Ecological Units of the Eastern United States 1st Approximation (Keys et al. 1995) subsections, Natural Heritage Program data, and ecoregions and subregions of Canada's provincial Ecological Land Classifications.

Critical Floodplains (critical_floodplains)

This dataset represents the results of a GIS based model to identify floodplain and riparian communities in Northern Appalachian/Acadian ecoregion. This layer contains portfolio critical occurrences only. Attributes include items such as the size of the occurrence, elevation, bedrock geology, conservation status, landscape context, and portfolio status. A vector data layer. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

Critical Matrix Forest Blocks (critical_matrix)

These matrix occurrences are the Tier 1 portfolio matrix occurrences only (n = 176). They represent the best examples of viable matrix forest and encompass at least 1 representative of each matrix Ecological Land Unit (ELU) group. Matrix occurrences are bounded by fragmenting features such as roads, railroads, major utility lines, and major shorelines. A vector data layer. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

Critical Ravines (critical_ravines)

This dataset represents the results of a GIS based model to identify communities of ravines, bowls, and moist hollows in Northern Appalachian/Acadian ecoregion. This layer contains portfolio critical occurrences only. Attributes include items such as the size of the occurrence, elevation, bedrock geology, conservation status, landscape context, and portfolio status. A vector data layer. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

Critical Steep Slopes (critical_slopes)

This dataset represents the results of a GIS based model to identify steep slope communities in Northern Appalachian/Acadian ecoregion. This layer contains portfolio critical occurrences only. Attributes include items such as the size of the occurrence, elevation, bedrock geology, conservation status, landscape context, and portfolio status. A vector data layer. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

Portfolio of Critical Streams (critical_streams)

This dataset contains the portfolio critical streams for the U.S. only. These represent priority aquatic systems that emerged from the Eastern Region Ecoregional Portfolio Assessments as of 5/4/2006. These features were the result of a scientific analysis to identify viable examples of each small (size 2), medium (size 3), and large (size 4) river system type within the ecoregion. Although a few headwater and small coastal stream (size 1) examples did emerge in this analysis, headwater streams were not comprehensively addressed in this analysis to date. A vector data layer. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

Critical Summits (critical_summits)

This dataset represents the results of a GIS based model to identify rocky summit communities in Northern Appalachian/Acadian ecoregion. This layer contains portfolio critical occurrences only. Attributes include items such as the size of the occurrence, elevation, bedrock geology, conservation status, landscape context, and portfolio status. A vector data layer. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

Critical Wetbasins (critical_wetbasins)

This dataset represents the results of a GIS based model to identify freshwater wetland communities in Northern Appalachian/Acadian ecoregion. This layer contains portfolio critical occurrences only. Attributes include items such as the size of the occurrence, elevation, bedrock geology, conservation status, landscape context, and portfolio status. A vector data layer. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

All Floodplains (floodplains)

This dataset represents the results of a GIS based model to identify floodplain and riparian communities in Northern Appalachian/Acadian ecoregion. Attributes include items such as the size of the occurrence, elevation, bedrock geology, conservation status, landscape context, and portfolio status. A vector data layer. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

All Matrix Forest Blocks (matrix)

These matrix occurrences (n = 424) represent the viable matrix forest occurrences in the ecoregion. Tier 1 occurrences (n = 176) are the portfolio matrix occurrences. They represent the best examples of viable matrix forest and encompass at least 1 representative of each matrix Ecological Land Unit (ELU) group. Tier 2 (n = 167) occurrences are also viable matrix occurrences, but are not needed to meet representation goals for the portfolio. Tier 2 occurrences represent the alternate portfolio. Matrix occurrences are bounded by fragmenting features such as roads, railroads, major utility lines, and major shorelines. A vector data layer. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

All Ravines (ravines)

This dataset represents the results of a GIS based model to identify communities of ravines, bowls, and moist hollows in Northern Appalachian/Acadian ecoregion. Attributes include items such as the size of the occurrence, elevation, bedrock geology, conservation status, landscape context, and portfolio status. A vector data layer. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

All Steep Slopes (slopes)

This dataset represents the results of a GIS based model to identify steep slope communities in Northern Appalachian/Acadian ecoregion. Attributes include items such as the size of the occurrence, elevation, bedrock geology, conservation status, landscape context, and portfolio status. A vector data layer. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

All Summits (summits)

This dataset represents the results of a GIS based model to identify rocky summit communities in Northern Appalachian/Acadian ecoregion. Attributes include items such as the size of the occurrence, elevation, bedrock geology, conservation status, landscape context, and portfolio status. A vector data layer. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

All Wetbasins (wetbasins)

This dataset represents the results of a GIS based model to identify freshwater wetland communities in Northern Appalachian/Acadian ecoregion. Attributes include items such as the size of the occurrence, elevation, bedrock geology, conservation status, landscape context, and portfolio status. A vector data layer. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

Land Cover (landcover)

Land Cover data (circa 1990's) was compiled and crosswalked between U.S. and Canadian data sources to yield a regional dataset representing 13 major land cover types. These types include the following: Inland Open Water/Ocean, Low-High Intensity Residential, Commercial/Industrial/Transportation, Bare Rock/Sand/Clay, Quarries/Strip Mines/Gravel Pits/Peat Bogs, Regenerating Forest, Deciduous Forest, Conifer Forest, Mixed Forest, Shrubland, Agriculture/Plantations/Cultivated, and Forested Wetland, Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands. The input datasets which represented a variety of spatial scales were resampled to a pixel resolution of 30m x 30m cell. A raster data layer with a cell size of 30 m. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

Secured Areas (U.S. Only) (securedareas)

Secured Areas are managed parcels protected for natural resource conservation. These lands are owned and managed by various organizations: public and private, for-profit and non-profit. Compiled from numerous states, provincial and non-profit sources (refer to full metadata available into the Data Warehouse). Can only be distributed for the U.S. due to licensing constraints associated with Canadian data sources. Attributes include common name, ownership, management agency and GAP class. A vector data layer. Contributed by The Nature Conservancy. Lead researcher Mark Anderson.

Connectivity layers (Connectivity)

Connectivity

GAP Corridors (GAP_Corridors)

Corridors modeled between GAP status 1 lands > 1,000 ha. Models created by Ryan Perkyl and Rob Baldwin at Clemson University, South Carolina.

GAP Edges (GAP_Edges)

Edges modeled between nodes representing GAP status 1 lands > 1,000 ha. Models created by Ryan Perkyl and Rob Baldwin at Clemson University, South Carolina.

GAP Linkages (GAP_Linkages)

Corridors modeled between GAP status 1 lands > 1,000 ha. Models created by Ryan Perkyl and Rob Baldwin at Clemson University, South Carolina.

GAP Minimum Spanning Tree (GAP_Min_Span_Tree)

Minimum spanning tree (edges that connect all possible nodes with the shortest edge distance) between GAP status 1 lands > 1,000 ha. Models created by Ryan Perkyl and Rob Baldwin at Clemson University, South Carolina.

GAP Nodes (GAP_Nodes)

Nodes used to model connectivity between GAP status 1 lands > 1,000 ha. Models created by Ryan Perkyl and Rob Baldwin at Clemson University, South Carolina.

GAP Patches (GAP_Patches)

GAP status 1 lands > 1,000 ha used to model connectivity. Models created by Ryan Perkyl and Rob Baldwin at Clemson University, South Carolina.

Last of the Wild Corridors (Last_of_the_Wild_Corridors)

Corridors modeled between the Last of the Wild. Models created by Ryan Perkyl and Rob Baldwin at Clemson University, South Carolina.

Last of the Wild Edges (Last_of_the_Wild_Edges)

Edges modeled between nodes representing Last of the Wild. Models created by Ryan Perkyl and Rob Baldwin at Clemson University, South Carolina.

Last of the Wild Linkages (Last_of_the_Wild_Linkages)

Corridors modeled between Last of the Wild. Models created by Ryan Perkyl and Rob Baldwin at Clemson University, South Carolina.

Last of the Wild Minimum Spanning Tree (Last_of_the_Wild_Min_Span_Tree)

Minimum spanning tree (edges that connect all possible nodes with the shortest edge distance) between GAP status 1 lands > 1,000 ha. Models created by Ryan Perkyl and Rob Baldwin at Clemson University, South Carolina.

Last of the Wild Nodes (Last_of_the_Wild_Nodes)

Nodes used to model connectivity between Last of the Wild. Models created by Ryan Perkyl and Rob Baldwin at Clemson University, South Carolina.

Last of the Wild Patches (Last_of_the_Wild_Patches)

Last of the Wild used to model connectivity. Models created by Ryan Perkyl and Rob Baldwin at Clemson University, South Carolina.

Marten Corridors (Marten_Corridors)

Corridors modeled between the marten source population habitat patches > 1,000 ha. Models created by Ryan Perkyl and Rob Baldwin at Clemson University, South Carolina.

Marten Edges (Marten_Edges)

Edges modeled between nodes representing marten source population habitat patches > 1,000 ha. Models created by Ryan Perkyl and Rob Baldwin at Clemson University, South Carolina.

Marten Linkages (Marten_Linkages)

Corridors modeled between marten source population habitat patches > 1,000 ha. Models created by Ryan Perkyl and Rob Baldwin at Clemson University, South Carolina.

Marten Minimum Spanning Tree (Marten_Min_Span_Tree)

Minimum spanning tree (edges that connect all possible nodes with the shortest edge distance) between marten source population habitat patches > 1,000 ha. Models created by Ryan Perkyl and Rob Baldwin at Clemson University, South Carolina.

Marten Nodes (Marten_Nodes)

Nodes used to model connectivity between Last of the Wild. Models created by Ryan Perkyl and Rob Baldwin at Clemson University, South Carolina.

Marten Patches (Marten_Patches)

Marten source population habitat patches > 1,000 ha used to model connectivity. Models created by Ryan Perkyl and Rob Baldwin at Clemson University, South Carolina.

WCSCanada layers (Wildlife_Conservation_Society_Canada)

Wildlife_Conservation_Society_Canada

Human Footprint (HF) (human_footprint)

The Human Footprint (HF) is a measure of ecologically relative human influence on the land created from publicly available datasets of population density, housing density, roads, rail, landcover, mines, dams, watershed and utility corridors. Human Footprint scores range from 0 to 100. A raster data layer with a grid cell size of 90m. Contributed by the Wildlife Conservation Society Canada. Lead researcher Gillian Woolmer.

Human Influence Index (human_influence_index)

The Human Influence Index (HII) is a measure of direct human influence on the land created from publicly available datasets of population density, housing density, urban areas, roads, rail, landcover, mines, dams, watershed and utility corridors. HII scores range from 0 to 47. A raster data layer with a grid cell size of 90m. Contributed by the Wildlife Conservation Society Canada. Lead researcher Gillian Woolmer.

Last of the Wild (LTW) (last_wild)

The Last of the Wild (n = 120) are the largest and wildest places in the Northern Appalachian/Acadian Ecoregion. They are derived from the Human Footprint. Land with a Human Footprint score less than or equal to 10 is considered wild. A vector data layer. Contributed by the Wildlife Conservation Society Canada. Lead researcher Gillian Woolmer.

TWP layers (The_Wildlands_Project)

The_Wildlands_Project

A2A Corridor (a2a_corridor)

The Adirondack to Algonquin corridor. Contributed by the Wildlands Network. Project lead is Conrad Reining.

GAP 3 Status Protected Lands (GAP3_status_protected_lands)

GAP 3 status protected areas, including Canadian Crown lands. No attibute details are contained in order not to violate established data licensing agreements. Contributed by the Wildlands Network. Project lead is Conrad Reining.

Predicted Lynx Habitat under current landscape conditions (2003) (lynx_2003)

Predicted Lynx Habitat under current landscape conditions - no population cycling, fecundity and survival set at mean rates of cycle. This data set is one of the outputs of Carlos Carroll's work on focal species in the Northern Appalachians. Static habitat suitability models for lynx, marten, and wolf were fed through a spatially explicit population model (SEPM), called PATCH. This is a raster datasets with a cell size of 1000 m. Contributed by the Wildlands Project. Lead contact Conrad Reining. Ref: Carroll, C. (2005).

Predicted Lynx Habitat under population cycling scenario (lynx_cycling)

Predicted Lynx Habitat under population cycling scenario population cycling throughout region, using demographic multipliers. This data set is one of the outputs of Carlos Carroll's work on focal species in the Northern Appalachians. Static habitat suitability models for lynx, marten, and wolf were fed through a spatially explicit population model (SEPM), called PATCH. This is a raster datasets with a cell size of 1000 m. Contributed by the Wildlands Project. Lead contact Conrad Reining. Ref: Carroll, C. (2005).

Predicted Lynx Habitat with population cycling only in the Gaspe (lynx_no_trap)

Predicted Lynx Habitat with population cycling only in the Gaspe peninsula. This data set is one of the outputs of Carlos Carroll's work on focal species in the Northern Appalachians. Static habitat suitability models for lynx, marten, and wolf were fed through a spatially explicit population model (SEPM), called PATCH. This is a raster datasets with a cell size of 1000 m. Contributed by the Wildlands Project. Lead contact Conrad Reining. Ref: Carroll, C. (2005).

Predicted Lynx Habitat under increased trapping scenario (lynx_trapping)

Predicted Lynx Habitat under increased trapping scenario - population cycling only in the Gaspe peninsula, and survival in Gaspe and central Quebec population set at 90% of base level. This data set is one of the outputs of Carlos Carroll's work on focal species in the Northern Appalachians. Static habitat suitability models for lynx, marten, and wolf were fed through a spatially explicit population model (SEPM), called PATCH. This is a raster datasets with a cell size of 1000 m. Contributed by the Wildlands Project. Lead contact Conrad Reining. Ref: Carroll, C. (2005).

Predicted Marten Habitat under current landscape conditions (2003) (marten_current)

Predicted Marten Habitat under current landscape conditions - Survival in trapped areas 90% of base level, survival in untrapped areas 100% of base level. This data set is one of the outputs of Carlos Carroll's work on focal species in the Northern Appalachians. Static habitat suitability models for lynx, marten, and wolf were fed through a spatially explicit population model (SEPM), called PATCH. This is a raster datasets with a cell size of 1000 m. Contributed by the Wildlands Project. Lead contact Conrad Reining. Ref: Carroll, C. (2005).

Predicted Marten Habitat under increased timber harvest scenario (marten_logging)

Predicted Marten Habitat under increased timber harvest scenario is double the percentage of regenerating forest with corresponding decrease in ratio of mixed/conifer forest. This data set is one of the outputs of Carlos Carroll's work on focal species in the Northern Appalachians. Static habitat suitability models for lynx, marten, and wolf were fed through a spatially explicit population model (SEPM), called PATCH. This is a raster datasets with a cell size of 1000 m. Contributed by the Wildlands Project. Lead contact Conrad Reining. Ref: Carroll, C. (2005).

Predicted Marten Habitat under timber restoration scenario (marten_restore)

Predicted Marten Habitat under timber restoration scenario ? conversion of all regenerating forest to mixed/conifer forest. This data set is one of the outputs of Carlos Carroll's work on focal species in the Northern Appalachians. Static habitat suitability models for lynx, marten, and wolf were fed through a spatially explicit population model (SEPM), called PATCH. This is a raster datasets with a cell size of 1000 m. Contributed by the Wildlands Project. Lead contact Conrad Reining. Ref: Carroll, C. (2005).

Predicted Marten Habitat under increased trapping scenario (marten_trapping)

Predicted Wolf Habitat under future landscape change scenario (year 2025).This data set is one of the outputs of Carlos Carroll's work on focal species in the Northern Appalachians. Static habitat suitability models for lynx, marten, and wolf were fed through a spatially explicit population model (SEPM), called PATCH. This is a raster datasets with a cell size of 1000 m. Contributed by the Wildlands Project. Lead contact Conrad Reining. Ref: Carroll, C. (2005).

New Brunswick Buffer (new_brunswick_buffer)

A proposed wildlands network design for the Greater Northern Appalachian network design for the Greater Northern Appalachian region of the northeastern United States and southeastern Canada. Contributed by the Wildlands Network. Project lead is Conrad Reining.

Protected Areas (protected_areas)

GAP 1 and GAP2 status protected areas. No attibute details are contained in order not to violate established data licensing agreements. Contributed by the Wildlands Network. Project lead is Conrad Reining.

Selection Frequency (summed_summed_runs)

The average of the summed runs from all 12 scenarios of a reserve site selection analysis performed using MARXAN with 10 square km hexagon planning units (100 runs per scenario, 12 scenarios analyzed). Planning units attributed with the values between 0 and 100, representing the average frequency of selection. Contributed by the Wildlands Project. Lead researchers Patrick Doran and Conrad Reining.

TNC Ecoregions (tnc_ecoregions)

From the North American dataset of ecoregions developed by the Nature Conservancy (TNC)

Wildlands Network Design (wildland_network_design)

A proposed wildlands network design for the Greater Northern Appalachian network design for the Greater Northern Appalachian region of the northeastern United States and southeastern Canada. Contributed by the Wildlands Network. Project lead is Conrad Reining.

Wildlands Network Design (wildland_network_design_by_category)

A proposed wildlands network design for the Greater Northern Appalachian network design for the Greater Northern Appalachian region of the northeastern United States and southeastern Canada. Contributed by the Wildlands Network. Project lead is Conrad Reining.

Predicted Wolf Habitat under future landscape change (2025) (wolf_2005)

Predicted Wolf Habitat under future landscape change scenario (year 2025).This data set is one of the outputs of Carlos Carroll's work on focal species in the Northern Appalachians. Static habitat suitability models for lynx, marten, and wolf were fed through a spatially explicit population model (SEPM), called PATCH. This is a raster datasets with a cell size of 1000 m. Contributed by the Wildlands Project. Lead contact Conrad Reining. Ref: Carroll, C. (2005).

Predicted Wolf Habitat under current landscape conditions (2003) (wolf_2003)

Predicted world habitat under current Landscape conditions (~2003) This data set is one of the outputs of Carlos Carroll's work on focal species in the Northern Appalachians. Static habitat suitability models for lynx, marten, and wolf were fed through a spatially explicit population model (SEPM), called PATCH. This is a raster datasets with a cell size of 1000 m. Contributed by the Wildlands Project. Lead contact Conrad Reining. Ref: Carroll, C. (2005).

There are currently no notifications for the service, click the feed icon to subscribe.